Well, this is nothing new the death of Osama bin Laden. It is impossible that you've gotten this far without having seen at least one news that treats the death of "terrorist." It is no secret to anyone.
I will not even enter the discussion on whether or not to kill Uncle Bin Laden. If he deserved a decent trial and blah blah blah. But what comes calling my humble attention is the amount of people who insist on the preposterous excuse of conspiracy theory. As if all that involved the United States were naturally linked to Manichean authoritarian who use their tentacles to the whole planet does not become domesticated imbeciles.
It seems that they opened their eyes to the U.S., but closed to Michael Moore, the great champion of unbiased reality. Not that it has merits, but let's consider a little bit, is good for your sanity.
Many charge that at least one photo of the corpse go public in an attempt to almost necrophiliac "revenge." Is that worth the risk of al-Qaeda feel religiously offended by a photo display of their greatest leader dead, probably disfigured?
Speaking of Al-Qaeda, it would not be offended if the U.S. were lying? And this, in turn, do not retaliate by Americans? Even if only with a statement?
Was Barack Obama the President of the most imperialist of the planet, naive enough to tell a lie in the global network, and run the risk of Bin Laden appears in a video (as always had the habit of doing) the demoralizing, rubbing his vitality in the face of the world?
Even Republicans, who are fierce opposition from Obama, they would not know how this "conspiracy" and thus use that to win the next election? And worse, why they (well constrained, of course) praised the president for the deed? They are part of the farce?
If it is to believe in conspiracy, I prefer the one that defends Bin Laden dead for longer.Find that in times of Wikileaks, a lie so easily contestable can be told, it seems naive skeptics.
Who knows eh!
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário